By Jonathan Landay
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A U.S.&nbsp;State&nbsp;Department&nbsp;report on Friday criticized the handling of the&nbsp;2021&nbsp;evacuation&nbsp;from&nbsp;Afghanistan, saying decisions by President Joe&nbsp;Biden&nbsp;and his predecessor Donald&nbsp;Trump&nbsp;to withdraw troops had "serious consequences for the viability" and security of the former U.S.-backed government.
Adverse findings in the report also reflected badly on Secretary of&nbsp;State&nbsp;Antony Blinken, without naming him. They included the&nbsp;department's failure to expand its crisis-management task force as the Taliban advanced on Kabul in August&nbsp;2021&nbsp;and the lack of a senior diplomat "to oversee all elements of the crisis response."
"Naming a 7th floor principal ... would have improved coordination across different lines of effort," said the report, referring to the&nbsp;State&nbsp;Department's top floor where Blinken and senior diplomats have offices.
The&nbsp;review, and a similar Pentagon study, contributed to a report released by the White House in April. But the&nbsp;State&nbsp;Department&nbsp;review's&nbsp;critical&nbsp;findings were not reflected in the White House report.
White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre defended&nbsp;Biden's handling of the Afghan pullout.
"He had to make a decision," she told reporters on Friday. The United&nbsp;States had poured "billions of dollars into a war with no end in sight" and that "he wanted to stop that, he wanted to end that," she said.
Steven Cheung, a spokesman for&nbsp;Trump, wrote in an email: "There&rsquo;s only one person responsible for the disastrous pullout of&nbsp;Afghanistan&nbsp;&mdash; Joe&nbsp;Biden,"
The White House report effectively blamed the chaotic U.S. pullout and&nbsp;evacuation&nbsp;operation on a lack of planning and troop reduction rounds by&nbsp;Trump&nbsp;following a 2020 deal with the Taliban to withdraw U.S. forces.
"I can't speak to that internal coordination piece and how the administration settled on the core conclusions that it presented" in April, a senior&nbsp;State&nbsp;Department&nbsp;official said.
The official, briefing reporters on condition of anonymity, declined to say why the&nbsp;review&nbsp;dated March 2022 was withheld from release until the eve of the July 4 holiday weekend.
WITHDRAWAL AFTER 20 YEARS
The U.S troop pullout and&nbsp;evacuation&nbsp;of U.S. and allied officials, citizens and Afghans at risk of Taliban retribution saw crowds of desperate Afghans trying to enter Kabul airport and men clinging to aircraft as they taxied down runways.
An Islamic&nbsp;State&nbsp;suicide bomber killed 13 U.S. servicemembers and more than 150 Afghans outside an airport gate.
The&nbsp;State&nbsp;Department&nbsp;released 24 pages of a 85-page After Action Report - the rest remained classified - on its handling of the&nbsp;evacuation&nbsp;operation launched as the last U.S.-led international forces departed after 20 years of backing successive Kabul governments against the Taliban.
It praised the performance of American embassy personnel working under difficult conditions like the COVID-19 pandemic and reduced security because of the U.S. troop drawdown, whose speed "compounded the difficulties the&nbsp;department&nbsp;faced."
Some 125,000 people, including nearly 6,000 Americans, were flown out of Kabul before the last U.S. soldiers departed on Aug. 30,&nbsp;2021, as the Taliban consolidated their grip on Kabul after the U.S.-backed government fled.
"The decisions of both President&nbsp;Trump&nbsp;and President&nbsp;Biden&nbsp;to end the U.S. military mission in&nbsp;Afghanistan&nbsp;had serious consequences for the viability of the Afghan government and its security," said the&nbsp;review.
While those decisions were outside its scope, the&nbsp;review&nbsp;said that "during both administrations there was insufficient senior-level consideration of worst-case scenarios and how quickly those might follow."
A White House spokesperson disputed that conclusion. He pointed to a White House report finding that there were extensive meetings and tabletop exercises to explore&nbsp;evacuation&nbsp;scenarios as part of the planning process, including contingencies "actually worse than the worst-case predictions."
The&nbsp;State&nbsp;Department&nbsp;review&nbsp;said&nbsp;department&nbsp;planning "was hindered" because it was "unclear" which senior official "had the lead."
Senior administration officials also failed to make "clear decisions regarding the universe of at-risk Afghans" to be included in the&nbsp;evacuation&nbsp;by the time it started nor had they determined where Afghan evacuees would be taken, it said.
Preparation and planning "were inhibited" by the&nbsp;Biden&nbsp;administration's reluctance to take steps that could signal a loss of confidence in the Kabul government "and thus contribute to its collapse," the&nbsp;review&nbsp;found.
"The complicated&nbsp;Department&nbsp;task force structure that was created when the&nbsp;evacuation&nbsp;began proved confusing to many participants, and knowledge management and communication among and across various lines of effort was problematic," it said.
(Reporting by Jonathan Landay; additional reporting by Steve Holland; editing by Grant McCool, Alistair Bell and Cynthia Osterman)

you might like

State Department review of 2021 Afghanistan evacuation critical of Biden, Trump