The Public Attorney's Office (PAO) wishes to revise or delete a section of the new Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (CPRA) for lawyers.
This is to avoid a situation in which PAO's lawyers ostensibly represent opposing sides in a dispute.
PAO chief Persida Rueda-Acosta is afraid that this would lead to a conflict of interest among public defenders.
As a result, she is seeking a meeting with the Supreme Court's justices. To that end, Acosta submitted a letter to Supreme Court Chief Justice Alexander Gesmundo.
The problem is specifically addressed in Section 22 of the code.
Acosta explained that appearing in a case pending in another jurisdiction would jeopardize their allocated cases and other public services requested by the district office.
The CPRA supersedes the country's 34-year-old Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR), which governed the conduct of lawyers.
Acosta also mentioned a logistical issue caused by the clause, stating that PAO will have to appoint a separate lawyer from another district.
Because of the restricted plantilla jobs at her office, she believes this situation will be challenging.

you might like

PAO seeks changes in lawyers’ code to avoid conflict of interest